UPDATE: Tensions rise in Texas as immigration enforcement becomes a focal point in the state’s political landscape, despite a significant drop in border crossings. New reports confirm that federal operations, particularly by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), are reshaping the dialogue as candidates prepare for the upcoming March 3, 2025 primary.
In Edinburg, construction leader Mario Guerrero expressed frustration over the impact of federal raids on his business. “The whole workforce, whether people have proper documentation or not, they’re all scared,” Guerrero said. “It’s affecting our businesses a lot.” As border crossings decline sharply, Texas Republicans are pivoting to emphasize enforcement rather than comprehensive immigration reform, aiming to energize their conservative base.
The political shift is notable: Border Patrol encounters have decreased significantly, with most migrants turned away or placed into expedited removal. Federal data shows that ICE apprehensions surged by 132% between January and October 2025 compared to the same period in 2024. This shift has altered the narrative, with candidates like incumbent John Cornyn, Attorney General Ken Paxton, and U.S. Rep. Wesley Hunt standing firmly behind enforcement actions.
Republican candidates are leveraging the heightened visibility of ICE operations to assert their commitment to law and order. Cornyn recently hosted a group of Senate Republican colleagues at the border, showcasing new funds for deportations and enhanced border security. He has also proposed legislation to increase penalties for those who assault law enforcement during immigration enforcement actions.
However, criticism is mounting. Democrats, including U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett and state Rep. James Talarico, are challenging the aggressive ICE tactics, citing negative effects on local economies and communities. Talarico condemned the current administration’s approach, arguing it creates unnecessary fear among immigrant populations. “That failure by Joe Biden paved the way for Donald Trump to come in with masked men in unmarked vehicles,” he stated, advocating for a comprehensive strategy that includes more immigration judges and an overhaul of the asylum system.
The political stakes are high, as candidates grapple with evolving voter sentiments. While deep concerns about illegal immigration persist, many Texans recognize the economic contributions of immigrants. This duality could impact election outcomes, especially in the general election, where voters may prioritize economic stability over strict enforcement.
As the race heats up, candidates are positioning themselves to either embrace or challenge the enforcement-heavy rhetoric. Paxton and Hunt are framing Cornyn’s past skepticism towards expansive border walls as a disconnect from the Trump agenda. Meanwhile, Crockett has faced backlash for her comments equating ICE operations to “slave patrols,” emphasizing the need for humane treatment and civil rights.
Amid these developments, the question remains: how will immigration politics evolve as Texas approaches the primaries? The urgency of the situation is palpable, as candidates must navigate the thin line between appealing to their base and addressing the broader electorate’s concerns.
Watch for critical debates and campaign strategies to unfold in the coming weeks as the Texas immigration narrative continues to shift. With both parties vying for voter support, the impact of these immigration policies on local communities could become a pivotal issue in the upcoming elections.
