BREAKING: A Los Angeles jury has just awarded a staggering $103 million in a landmark age discrimination case against Liberty Mutual, marking the largest verdict of its kind in U.S. history. This ruling highlights the urgent issue of age discrimination and serves as a pivotal moment for workers nationwide.
The verdict was delivered earlier today, with the jury finding that Liberty Mutual retaliated against former employee Joy Slagel, who spent over 30 years with the company. Slagel claimed she faced discrimination and harassment after reporting a corporate culture that favored younger workers. This verdict not only sets a new record but also sends a strong message to corporations about the consequences of age-related bias.
During the trial, led by Justin Shegerian from Shegerian & Associates, the jury sided with Slagel on all counts, confirming that her termination was a direct result of her complaints regarding ageist hiring practices. Despite her stellar performance record, Slagel was dismissed shortly after raising concerns, illustrating the serious ramifications for employees who stand up against discrimination.
“This verdict is a resounding message to corporations nationwide,” said Shegerian. “Age discrimination is illegal, it is harmful, and juries will hold employers accountable.”
The case dates back to its initial filing in 2017, where Slagel faced significant challenges, including the dismissal of her claims and sanctions against her. However, after a successful appeal in 2023, the case was revived, leading to this historic trial outcome.
Throughout the proceedings, the Shegerian team presented compelling evidence, including witness testimonies from other long-serving employees who experienced similar treatment. The jury heard how Liberty Mutual’s internal strategies reportedly favored younger hires, undermining the jobs of older, more experienced staff.
The jury awarded Slagel $20 million in non-economic damages and a staggering $83 million in punitive damages, solidifying the total at $103 million. This amount reflects both the severity of the company’s actions and the commitment of the jury to combat workplace discrimination.
Justin Shegerian, the youngest attorney to achieve a verdict over $20 million in such cases, expressed gratitude for the jury’s decision, emphasizing the importance of holding employers accountable for their actions. “It’s rewarding to represent someone who is so genuinely deserving of this result,” he noted.
This case acts as a cautionary tale for businesses, reinforcing that ignoring age discrimination can lead to severe legal consequences. As Slagel’s fight for justice resonates with many, this verdict may encourage more employees to come forward and challenge discriminatory practices in the workplace.
As this story develops, the implications of the verdict will likely influence corporate policies and employee rights across the nation. The legal community and advocates for workplace equality will be watching closely to see how this landmark case shapes future litigation surrounding age discrimination.
