California’s CARE Court program, initiated by Governor Gavin Newsom two years ago, aims to provide treatment and housing for individuals struggling with severe mental illness. Designed to offer court-supervised plans, the program has generated diverse responses from families and individuals who have engaged with its services. As participants, petitioners, and employees share their experiences, it becomes clear that while some have found hope, others have faced significant challenges.
Personal Stories of Struggles and Triumphs
One poignant story comes from June Dudas, who received a distressing text from her 84-year-old aunt during a church service. Her aunt was hiding from her son, Ed, outside her San Diego home. Ed, described as a “gentle giant” when stable, exhibited dangerous behavior during episodes of psychosis. After submitting a CARE Court petition for Ed, Dudas was disheartened when he refused help and his case was dismissed. “It’s like, ‘OK, Eddy, they’re saying that when you’re well enough to understand how sick you are, then they’re ready to help you,’” Dudas expressed, highlighting the program’s perceived shortcomings.
In contrast, another participant, known as J.M., experienced a more positive outcome. Found homeless in Oakland last February, he was temporarily placed in a psychiatric hospital and later provided with housing through CARE Court. J.M. now lives in a hotel converted for mental health services and is focusing on rebuilding his life. “It’s been pretty good,” he said, expressing optimism about his future goals, including obtaining a GED.
The Impact on Families
For Mary Peters, the CARE Court program has been transformative. After filing a petition for her sister, who struggled with mental illness and homelessness, the CARE team located her sister and assisted in securing stable housing. Peters noted the immense relief she felt, stating, “Without the CARE team, it would have been impossible for me to do this.” Her sister has since graduated from the program and now lives independently, reconnecting with family along the way.
Conversely, Antonio Hernandez faced hurdles while seeking help for his sister, who has schizophrenia. After initially being hopeful about the CARE Court, he encountered delays and confusion within the system. “You have to be at your worst for them to help,” he lamented. His sister eventually became homeless, raising concerns about the effects of the program’s processes on her mental health.
For others like C.M., who faced near homelessness, CARE Court provided timely intervention. After receiving assistance, she secured stable housing and is now pursuing education and job opportunities in construction management. “I literally didn’t spend any time on the streets after I got evicted, because of CARE Court,” she remarked, emphasizing the importance of stability in her recovery.
Reflections on the Program
The program has not been without its critics. Anita Fisher, who once championed CARE Court, has since expressed disappointment. Her son, diagnosed with schizophrenia, faced a downward spiral after being discharged from care, leading to his arrest and subsequent challenges. “I look at it as a total failure,” she stated, reflecting on her experiences with the system designed to provide support.
As families navigate the complexities of mental health care, the varied experiences with CARE Court highlight both its potential and its limitations. While some have found pathways to stability and recovery, others confront ongoing struggles, underscoring the need for continuous evaluation and improvement of such initiatives.
This report draws from in-depth conversations with individuals impacted by the CARE Court program, showcasing a spectrum of experiences that reveal the multifaceted nature of mental health support in California. The stories illustrate not only the challenges faced by individuals and families but also the critical role of community and systemic support in addressing mental health issues.
