Euronet Worldwide Outperforms Chicago Atlantic in Financial Metrics

Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance and Euronet Worldwide are two finance companies that have drawn attention from investors. A recent analysis highlights key differences in their financial performance, institutional ownership, and market potential.

Comparative Financial Overview

Euronet Worldwide (NASDAQ:EEFT) has demonstrated stronger financial metrics compared to Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance (NASDAQ:REFI). Currently, Chicago Atlantic holds a consensus target price of $18.00, indicating a potential upside of 41.90%. In contrast, Euronet’s consensus target price stands at $117.60, reflecting a potential upside of 59.42%. This suggests that analysts favor Euronet due to its higher growth potential and stronger consensus rating.

Institutional ownership also indicates investor confidence. Approximately 25.5% of Chicago Atlantic’s shares are held by institutional investors, while Euronet boasts an impressive 91.6% institutional ownership. This strong backing from hedge funds and large investment managers suggests that they view Euronet as a more promising option for long-term growth.

Profitability and Risk Assessment

Profitability metrics further differentiate the two companies. Euronet Worldwide outperforms Chicago Atlantic in terms of net margins, return on equity, and return on assets.

In terms of volatility, Chicago Atlantic has a beta of 0.22, indicating that it is 78% less volatile than the S&P 500. Euronet, with a beta of 0.86, is 14% less volatile than the index. This suggests that investors may find Chicago Atlantic to be a safer investment, although Euronet’s higher volatility may appeal to those seeking greater returns.

Company Profiles

Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, incorporated in 2021, is headquartered in Chicago, Illinois. The company specializes in originating and investing in first mortgage loans secured by commercial real estate properties, primarily focusing on the cannabis industry. As a Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT), it aims to distribute at least 90% of its taxable income to shareholders to avoid federal corporate income taxes.

On the other hand, Euronet Worldwide, founded in 1994 and based in Leawood, Kansas, provides a wide range of payment and transaction processing solutions. The company operates through three segments: Electronic Fund Transfer Processing, epay, and Money Transfer, catering to financial institutions and consumers worldwide. Its diverse offerings include ATM services, prepaid mobile airtime distribution, and foreign currency exchange, making it a robust player in the financial technology sector.

Conclusion

In summary, Euronet Worldwide surpasses Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance across multiple financial indicators. With its significant institutional backing, higher target price potential, and better profitability metrics, Euronet is positioned as the more favorable investment choice at this time. As the financial landscape evolves, investors will continue to monitor both companies for changes in performance and market conditions.