Investors are evaluating the comparative strength of two large-cap energy companies: Woodside Energy Group and Bloom Energy. This analysis contrasts various factors, including institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, risk, and dividends.
Volatility and Risk Assessment
Woodside Energy Group boasts a beta of 0.4, indicating that its stock price is approximately 60% less volatile than the S&P 500 index. In stark contrast, Bloom Energy has a significantly higher beta of 3.01, suggesting its stock price is 201% more volatile than the S&P 500. This stark difference highlights the risk profiles of the two companies, with Woodside presenting a more stable investment option.
Earnings and Valuation Comparisons
When comparing earnings and valuation metrics, Woodside Energy Group leads with higher gross revenue and earnings per share than Bloom Energy. This performance indicates a stronger financial position for Woodside, which may appeal to more risk-averse investors.
Analyst recommendations, however, tell a different story. According to data from MarketBeat.com, Bloom Energy has a consensus price target of $100.57, which reflects a potential downside of 30.46% from its current valuation. Despite this, analysts express a more favorable view towards Bloom Energy, suggesting a higher possible upside in the long term compared to Woodside.
Profitability metrics reveal that Woodside Energy Group enjoys better net margins, return on equity, and return on assets, further emphasizing its strong financial health relative to Bloom Energy.
Institutional ownership is another aspect where the two companies differ significantly. Only 3.2% of Woodside Energy Group shares are held by institutional investors, while a significant 77.0% of Bloom Energy shares are owned by these entities. Additionally, 0.0% of Woodside’s shares are held by company insiders, compared to 3.6% for Bloom Energy. High institutional ownership often indicates confidence from large investors in the stock’s long-term performance.
In summary, Bloom Energy outperforms Woodside Energy Group in nine of the twelve factors assessed. While Woodside shows stronger earnings and stability, Bloom Energy’s potential for growth and significant institutional backing makes it a compelling option for investors looking for higher-risk opportunities.
About Woodside Energy Group
Founded in 1954 and headquartered in Perth, Australia, Woodside Energy Group Ltd engages in the exploration, evaluation, development, production, and marketing of hydrocarbons across the Asia Pacific, Africa, the Americas, and Europe. The company produces liquefied natural gas, pipeline gas, crude oil, and natural gas liquids, holding interests in numerous projects, including Pluto LNG, North West Shelf, and Wheatstone.
About Bloom Energy
Bloom Energy Corporation, established in 2001 and based in San Jose, California, specializes in designing, manufacturing, and installing solid-oxide fuel cell systems for on-site power generation. The company’s technology converts various fuels, including natural gas and biogas, into electricity through an electrochemical process, without combustion, catering to diverse sectors such as utilities, data centers, and manufacturing.
In conclusion, while Woodside Energy Group presents a solid financial profile, Bloom Energy offers compelling growth potential, making the comparison an intriguing topic for investors in the energy sector.
