In a recent commentary, Jeffrey M. Landaw critiques the isolationist approach within President Donald Trump’s defense strategy, arguing that such a stance is unrealistic given current global dynamics. Landaw emphasizes that the United States’ economic and political interests extend far beyond its borders, a fact he believes is often overlooked in discussions about foreign policy.
Historical Context and Modern Realities
Landaw references the historical perspective of classical thinkers, particularly the ancient Greek historian Thucydides, who observed that “the strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must.” This framework, he suggests, is applicable to today’s geopolitical landscape, where nations like Russia, China, North Korea, and Iran operate under similar principles. In contrast, he argues that the ideals championed by John Quincy Adams and the Concert of Europe are outdated, especially in an era of complex international relations.
Landaw points out that earlier proponents of the America First ideology, during the 1930s, mistakenly believed that allowing dictators like Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin to contest power in Europe would not affect American interests. He asserts that this historical misjudgment underscores the dangers of isolationism, suggesting that today’s advocates of a similar stance are making the same errors.
A Call for Engagement
With a compelling argument, Landaw urges that a more engaged American foreign policy is necessary to protect both personal and political freedoms. He contends that an isolationist America is more of a fantasy than a practical strategy, as the interconnectedness of global economies and threats requires active participation on the world stage.
In conclusion, Landaw’s commentary serves as a reminder of the importance of recognizing the complexities of international relations in formulating defense strategies. As the world continues to evolve, so too must America’s approach to its role in global affairs.
